In recent times, repeatability vs reproducibility has become increasingly relevant in various contexts. What is the difference between repeatability, replicability and .... repeatability < reproducibility < replicability Where a successful replication means that the same finding has been achieved with different data (or sometimes methods) and reproducibility means that it is possible to get the same results given the data and analytical means from the original study. To what extent do we define an irreproducible result?. In this context, different levels of reproducibility In analytical chemistry, we discuss reproducibility at different levels. Or more precisely, with respect to different influencing (nuisance) factors.
Sometimes we use different terms for specific such levels, e.g. repeatability: the same lab redoing the (wet-lab) experiment arriving at the same conclusion (with a given probability). reproducibility: another ...
Do we know what proportion of scientific reproducibility issues are .... I've tended to assume that most reproducibility issues are poor reporting of experiments, poor recording of external factors, poor statistical analysis inflating p-values etc but I realise that I don't have much evidence to back that up apart from personal experience. Are there any studies that report the relative proportion of irreproducible experimental results resulting from fraud versus ...
First paper submission reproducibility AAAi25 - Academia Stack Exchange. I'm preparing my submission for AAAI25, and I came across the requirement for a reproducibility checklist. I am a bit confused about how this checklist should be submitted.
Should it be included as... What is an "un-reproducible result"? Building on this, - Academia Stack Exchange. In order to publish a research paper in a journal, one of the requirement may be the reproducibility of results. I'm wondering, in academia, how does an un-reproducible result even exist?
reproducible research - How can we perpetuate reproducibility .... A few ways to perpetuate reproducibility: As a stipulation to publication, publishers could require the software and data used for a research paper to be made publicly available so that others could reproduce the results. Academic institutions could provide repositories to allow its members to publish their code or data, to encourage making the code or data publicly available. Why are papers accepted even if they don't release code or data to .... Why are these papers accepted and publicized, even if they don't allow reproducibility?
Related: Reproducible Studies? and an example of the problem it causes Can up to 70% of scientific studies not be reproduced?. Reviewer rejects a paper and then publishes the same results as their ....
I believe this happened once. There was a trail of emails and documents proving that the reviewer has pillaged the work from someone else and the paper was withdrawn. Are there any experiment reproducibility databases?.
📝 Summary
Learning about repeatability vs reproducibility is crucial for people seeking to this subject. The insights shared in this article functions as a solid foundation for further exploration.
We trust that this article has given you valuable insights regarding repeatability vs reproducibility.